Recovery of Principal Protection Notes (PPN) Investment Losses

Have you suffered investment losses in Lehman Brothers Principal Protected Notes? The White Law Group may be able to help.  The firm is currently investigating whether brokerage firms misrepresented the risks of these investments when selling them to the public.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently announced that it has fined UBS Financial Services, Inc., $2.5 million, and required UBS to pay $8.25 million in restitution for omissions and statements made that effectively misled some investors regarding the “principal protection” feature of 100% Principal-Protection Notes (PPNs) Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. issued prior to its September 2008 bankruptcy filing.

Principal protected notes are fixed-income security structured products with a bond and an option component that promise a minimum return equal to the investor’s initial investment.

From March to June 2008 as the credit crisis worsened, UBS advertised and some UBS financial advisors described the structured notes as principal-protected investments and failed to emphasize they were unsecured obligations of Lehman Brothers, which eventually filed for bankruptcy in September 2008.

FINRA found that UBS:

• failed to emphasize adequately to some investors that the principal protection feature of the Lehman-issued Principal protected notes was subject to issuer credit risk;
• did not properly advise UBS financial advisors of the potential effect of the widening of credit default swap spreads on Lehman’s financial strength, or provide them with proper guidance on the use of that information with clients;
• failed to establish an adequate supervisory system for the sale of the Lehman-issued PPNs, and failed to provide sufficient training and written supervisory policies and procedures;
• did not adequately analyze the suitability of sales of the Lehman-issued PPNs to certain UBS customers;
• created and used advertising materials that had the effect of misleading some customers about specific characteristics of principal protected notes

FINRA found that some of UBS’ financial advisors did not understand the product, including the limitations of the “protection” feature. Consequently, certain financial advisors communicated incorrect information to their customers. Also, certain advertising materials had the effect of misleading customers regarding the characteristics and risks of the principal protected notes, including the nature, scope and limitations of the 100% Principal-Protection Notes. The materials suggested that a return of principal was guaranteed if customers held the product to maturity; however, UBS did not adequately address the importance that credit risk could result in loss of principal.

UBS’s suitability procedures were also lacking. UBS did not have risk profile requirements for certain principal protected notes; therefore, the principal protected notes were sold to some investors for whom the product was not suitable, including investors with “moderate” and “conservative” risk profiles. Moreover, these particular investors were more likely to rely on UBS’ representations about the “100% principal protection” feature of Lehman PPNs because of their risk averse investment objectives.

In settling this matter, UBS neither admitted nor denied the charges, but consented to the entry of FINRA’s findings.

If you have questions a principal protected note you purchased, please contact The White Law Group at 312-238-9650.

The White Law Group, LLC is a national securities fraud, securities arbitration, investor protection, and securities regulation/compliance law firm with offices in Chicago, Illinois and Boca Raton, Florida.

For more information on The White Law Group, visit https://whitesecuritieslaw.com.