Concerned about investment losses in Strategic Energy Income Fund II LP?
Have you suffered losses investing in Strategic Energy Income Fund II LP? If so, The White Law Group may be able to help you recover your losses by filing a FINRA arbitration claim against the brokerage firm that sold you the investment.
According to their website, for more than a decade, U.S. Energy has partnered with high net worth investors and financial institutions to provide unique access for ownership in the company’s oil & gas projects. Today, the company manages over $1 billion on behalf of their partners.
U.S. Energy Development Corporation raises money for investments through Reg D private placement offerings like the company did for Strategic Energy Income Fund II LP. The total private offering amount was $50,000,000. These Reg D private placements are typically sold by brokerage firms in exchange for a large up front commission, usually between 7-10%, as well as additional “due diligence fees” that can range from 1-3%.
The Trouble with Alternative Investments
The trouble with alternative investment products, like Strategic Energy Income Fund II LP, is that they involve a high degree of risk and are typically sold as unregistered securities which lack the same regulatory oversight as more traditional investment products like stocks or bonds. An additional risk inherent to U.S. Development Corporation offerings is also the general risk that comes with the energy market – a market that has seen enormous losses over the last few years due to the declining cost of oil and other energy commodities.
The White Law Group is investigating the liability that brokerage firms may have for improperly selling oil and gas private placements such as Strategic Energy Income Fund II LP
Broker dealers that sell alternative investments are required to perform adequate due diligence on all investment recommendations to ensure that each investment is suitable for the investor in light of the investor’s age, risk tolerance, net worth, financial needs, and investment experience.
However, another problem with Reg D private placements is that the high sales commission and due diligence fees the brokers earn for selling such products sometimes can provide brokers with an enormous incentive to push the product to unsuspecting investors who do not fully understand the risks of these types of investments or to outright misrepresentation the basic features of the products – usually focusing on the income potential and tax benefits while downplaying the risks.
Fortunately, FINRA does provide for an arbitration forum for investors to resolve such disputes and if a broker or brokerage firm makes an unsuitable investment recommendation or fails to adequately disclose the risks associated with an investment they may be liable for investment losses in a FINRA arbitration claim.
To determine whether you may be able to recover investment losses incurred as a result of your purchase of Strategic Energy Income Fund II LP or another U. S. Energy Development Corporation private placement investment, please contact The White Law Group at 1-888-637-5510 for a free consultation.
The White Law Group, LLC is a national securities fraud, securities arbitration, investor protection, and securities regulation/compliance law firm with offices in Chicago, Illinois and Franklin, Tennessee. The firm represents investors throughout the country in claims against their brokerage firm.
For more information on the firm and its representation of investors, visit www.WhiteSecuritiesLaw.com.
Tags: broker churning, Chicago broker fraud attorney, Chicago churning attorney, Chicago FINRA attorney, Chicago investment fraud attorney, Chicago securities attorney, Chicago securities lawyer, churning turnover ratio, Excessive brokerage fees, Excessive buying and selling securities, excessive financial advisor commissions, excessive financial advisor fees, Excessive stockbroker commissions, Excessive stockbroker fees, financial advisor account churning, financial advisor Churn & burn, financial advisor churning attorney, financial advisor churning lawyer, financial advisor Excessive commissions, Financial advisor Excessive fees, financial advisor Excessive transactions, Financial advisor frequent trades, Florida churning attorney, Florida churning lawyer, Frequent broker commissions, Frequent brokerage fees, how much trading is too much, Illinois churning attorney, Illinois churning lawyer, investment advisor account churning, investment advisor churn and burn, investment advisor excessive commissions, investment advisor excessive fees, investment advisor excessive transactions, investment advisor frequent trades, investment fraud attorney, oil and gas losses, private placement investments, stockbroker Account churning, stockbroker churning and burn, stockbroker churning attorney, stockbroker churning lawyer, stockbroker excessive commissions, stockbroker excessive fees, stockbroker excessive transactions, Stockbroker frequent trades, Strategic Energy Income Fund II LP class action, Strategic Energy Income Fund II LP complaints, Strategic Energy Income Fund II LP damages, Strategic Energy Income Fund II LP investigation, Strategic Energy Income Fund II LP Investment Losses, Strategic Energy Income Fund II LP investor relations, Strategic Energy Income Fund II LP lawsuit, Strategic Energy Income Fund II LP litigation, Strategic Energy Income Fund II LP recovery options, Strategic Energy Income Fund II LP reviews, Strategic Energy Income Fund II LP securities fraud attorney, Strategic Energy Income Fund II LP value, U.S. Energy Development Corporation class action, U.S. Energy Development Corporation investigation, U.S. Energy Development Corporation lawsuit, U.S. Energy Development Corporation losses, Vero Beach securities attorney, Vero Beach securities lawyer, what is churning, what is excessive trading, what turnover ratio is considered churning Last modified: March 7, 2017