Michael Piwowar says removing “artificial distinction” of accredited investor would boost returns, portfolio diversification
At the annual SEC Speaks conference held in Washington D.C. on Friday, Michael Piwowar, the acting chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, argued that the current definition of accredited investor needs an overhaul.
To be considered an accredited investor, you must have an individual income of $200,000, a joint income of $300,000, or a net worth that exceeds $1 million – not including a primary residence.
Piwowar argued that non-accredited investors who do not meet the current thresholds are being punished from reaping the same rewards and portfolio diversification benefits as those on the higher end of the income spectrum.
Because riskier investments often result in higher returns, Piwowar states that excluding non-accredited investors from these securities prevents them from realizing the same returns afforded to the wealthy.
“Distinguishing investors who can fend for themselves from those who cannot is a line-drawing exercise fraught with peril,” said Piwowar. “The Commission did just that in 1982 when it adopted Regulation D, dividing the world of private offering investors into two categories: those persons accorded the privileged status of “accredited investor” and those who are not.”
According to Piowar, adding riskier investments to an existing portfolio can aid in diversification and may allow investors to realize higher returns while mitigating risk.
Accredited vs. Non-accredited investors
Piwowar questioned whether the regulation is putting non-accredited investors at a serious disadvantage and exacerbating the inequalities of wealth and opportunity.
“In my view, there is a glaring need to move beyond the artificial distinction between ‘accredited’ and ‘non-accredited’ investors,” he said. “I question the notion that non-accredited investors are truly protected by regulations that prevent them from investing in high-risk, high-return securities available only to the Davos jet-set.”
Former SEC chair Mary Jo White directed her staff to recommend revising the accredited investor definition to allow individuals to qualify based on other measures of sophistication.
Last February, The House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed a bipartisan bill directing the SEC to expand its definition of an accredited investor under Regulation D rules, allowing those with professional knowledge relating to a particular investment to participate in private placements if qualified based on education history or job experience.
The foregoing information, which is all publicly available, is being provided by The White Law Group.
The White Law Group, LLC is a national securities fraud, securities arbitration, investor protection, and securities regulation/compliance law firm with offices in Chicago, Illinois and Franklin, Tennessee. For more information, please visit our website, www.whitesecuritieslaw.com.
Tags: Chicago FINRA attorney, Chicago securities attorney, Chicago securities lawyer, investment fraud attorney Chicago, investor protection, Michael Piwowar accredited investors, Michael Piwowar private placement, Michael Piwowar regulation D, Michael Piwowar SEC, Regulation D rules, SEC acting chair, Vero Beach securities attorney, Vero Beach securities fraud attorney, Vero Beach securities lawyer Last modified: December 6, 2022